Monday, April 29, 2013

Washington Republicans Hope To Legalize Discrimination Against Gay Couples

Out there in Washington, where marriage equality is legal, there are a group of twelve Republican state senators in Washington who want to make discrimination legal, too; I mean, if the discrimination is geared toward The Gays, that is.

It all began when Barronelle Stutzman decided to tell her longtime gay clients that she would not create flower arrangements for their wedding because the Baby Jeebus told her to be mean to The Gays.

Well, the story went viral—in fact, I wrote about it HERE and HERE—and then Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson filed a lawsuit against Stutzman for discrimination. In response, Republican state Senator Sharon Brown, along with 11 other of the 23 Republicans in the Washington state Senate, have decided to legalize discrimination against gay and lesbian couples by passing Senate Bill 5927. But, they don’t want folks to discriminate against The Gays just because the Baby Jeebus says so, they say their bill not only covers religious exceptions, but will allow discrimination based on “philosophical beliefs” or even “matters of conscience.”

Senator Sharon Brown
The bill says, in part:
“The right to act or refuse to act in a manner motivated by a sincerely held religious belief, philosophical belief, or matter of conscience may not be burdened unless the government proves that it has a compelling governmental interest in infringing the specific act or refusal to act and has used the least restrictive means to further that interest.”
The bill also notes that it does not allow the denial of services to anyone considered a protected class under federal law; race, religion and disability are all protected classes under federal law, but LGBT people are not.

So, they’re basically saying that since The Gays are not a class of people protected against discrimination, then, well, just go ahead and do it. But, let’s be clear, if say race and religion weren’t protected classes, imagine Barronelle Stutzman denying service to a Black couple or a Baptists couple.

Would you find that acceptable? And if you would, and you’re a business owner, please put signs in your windows saying ‘Straights Only’ so I know which stores to avoid.

9 comments:

  1. that sux! :(

    so imaginary friends (like jeebus) are OK, but real gay people are not? what kind of asshattery is THAT?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Next it will be setting up a gynecological exam table in your shop to make sure the bride is a virgin.

    (It won't pass but shocking that someone even made the effort.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't see this holding up under a test of constitutionality.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It never ceases to amaze me at the stupidity of some so-called adult people. They still believe their hate, ignorance and fear trumps all and will be supported by the majority of the public.
    Retired in Delaware

    ReplyDelete
  5. Stupid silly hate-filled people!!! Get a grip you homophobes, it doesnt matter if it makes you uncomforable, your comfort level shouldnt trump other humans lives.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Helen6:13 AM

    There may be clouds in Washington but the sun shines in the Netherlands http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22340046

    where the wife of the new head of state is a proponent of gay rights

    ReplyDelete
  7. These people wouldn't recognize jesus if he stood eighteen inches in front of their faces

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous10:10 AM

    Philosophical beliefs and matters of conscience? That's a sufficiently big "loophole" to let anything through.


    Nobody can legally force anyone to do business with anyone. That blade cuts both ways. Nobody can force customers to patronize a business either.

    I know I repeat myself. The fact that nobody wants to sit down and have a rational discussion anymore is really getting to me. (I have a giant case of cognitive dissonance over this for reasons I've made public in another lifetime.)

    I wish everybody could sit and talk through this for the simple, selfish reason that it would help keep me from going batcrap crazy.

    (Too late. I'm already there!)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous1:26 PM

    Bob:

    Feel free to take that last comment of mine down if you don't like it. I was primed to be in a ranting-raving mood this morning due to some kid stuff going on at my house the last few days.

    Sean


    ReplyDelete

Say anything, but keep it civil .......